Showing posts with label Romania. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romania. Show all posts

Saturday 24 June 2023

Romania: An Introduction

This post is an introduction to our June trip to Romania. The other posts will follow in due course.

Where we Went, Some History and The Important Numbers

Romania

Our week-long visit to Romania started on the 25-June-2023, when we flew into Bucharest from Luton.

Romania, as I expect you know, but will say it anyway, is a country in eastern Europe.

So that's where it is!

Where we Went, Why we Went There and How we Got About

Our six-day (7 night) trip traced out a clockwise right-angled trapezium across southern Romania. We spent the first night in Bucharest, then drove to Sibiu for two nights, on to Sighisoara for the next night, Brasov for two more and finished with a final night in Bucharest.

Our Romanian journey
This map shows no scale, but Bucharest to Sibiu is a drive of some 280km (175 miles)

I have drawn the journey on a map showing the old divisions of Romania, and as you can see we spent our week in the former Principalities of Walachia and Transylvania. The modern map with 41 similarly sized counties (plus Bucharest) has no use for these appealing old names.

Vlad III Țepeș and Dracula

Vlad Țepeș
1488 woodcut, Pub Dom
Transylvania is Romania’s prime tourist region, celebrated for its scenic beauty and rich history. It was also the home of Vlad III Țepeș (Vlad the Impaler) also known as Vlad Dracula, after his father Vlad Dracul (Vlad the Dragon). Despite his castle being at Bran in Transylvania, he was ruler of Walachia for three periods between 1438 and 1477.

A thoroughly nasty piece of work, he was the inspiration for Bram Stoker’s Dracula (published 1897) and Bran castle is the model for Dracula’s castle in the novel - though Stoker relied on other people’s descriptions as he never visited Romania himself. Vampires are mythical creatures in east European folklore and although Vlad Țepeș was a bloody thirsty ruler (in the metaphorical sense) he was never actually accused of vampirism.

Stoker’s character has since taken on a life (or undeath) of his own, from the silent Nosferato (1922) to Hammer’s Brides of Dracula (1960) and TV's Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997-2003), reaching its pinnacle with Count Duckula, the vegetarian vampire duck.

A Pleasanter Vlad

We were driven round by a large, amiable man called Vlad – not short for Vladimir of Vladislav, just Vlad. How he fits into a Dacia Duster is a mystery. Vlad is no longer a popular name in Romania, but he said he was 275 years old and the grandson of the original. As he seemed at ease in sunlight, and we saw him drink coffee and cola, but never blood, we assumed this was a joke.

Vlad and his Dacia Duster

350,000 Dacia Cars are made each year in Mioveni, a small town near the main road between Bucharest and Sibiu. The company, founded in Mioveni in 1966, has made considerable progress since the end of the USSR. They became part of the Renault Group in 1999 and the cars now have Renault engines. I fibbed earlier, there is no real secret to how Vlad fits into the Dacia, he just folds.

Folded Vlad

My Blogging Plan

I plan to eventually produce seven posts following this one:

Part 1 Bucharest
Part 2 Cozia Monastery and Sibiu
Part 3 Hunedoara and Alba Iulia
Part 4 Biertan and Sighisoara
Part 4 Rupea and Brasov
Part 6 Bear Sanctuary and Bran Castle (‘Dracula’s Castle’)
Part 7 Peles Castle and The Dealul Mare Wine Region

The plan may or may not be changed as I go along. If I do choose to alter the plan, I will come back to this page and change it to fit my new plan, so no one will ever know. As George Orwell observed in 1984: he who controls the present controls the past - an approximate quote.

A Little History

The patch of land now called Romania has as rich and complicated a history as any other part of Europe. This is, of necessity, a very sketchy historical overview.

440 BCE until the end of Roman Rule

It is no accident that Romania’s only carmaker is called Dacia. Modern humans have lived in the area for at least 45,000 years, but the first group known by name were the Dacians – Greek historian Herodotus tagged them in 440 BCE. The Dacians were a loose federation of tribes until uniting in 88 BCE under the (presumably) charismatic King Burebista, He ruled until 44 BCE and his successors held the kingdom together under ever-increasing Roman pressure until 106 CE when Dacia, inevitably, became a province of the Roman Empire.

Dacia under King Burebista around 44 BCE,
Copyright Gyalu22, reproduced under CC BY-SA 4.0

Dacia flourished financially under Roman rule. Immigrants/colonists from across the empire flocked in and created Roman cities, while the Dacian population probably remained predominantly rural.

The Bit in the Middle, 1,500 years in 76 Words

When the Romans left, the Goths and then Huns rampaged through, leaving their mark on the local gene pool, and then (former) Dacia settled into life at the cross road of empires; the Bulgarians and then Ottomans to the south, the Russians to the east and north and the Austro-Hungarians to the west. For some 1,500 years the land was either directly ruled by, or was a vassal state of, one or other of these empires.

The Birth of Modern Romania

Through all this turmoil, a thread survived that stretched all the way back to the Dacians and the Roman Empire. There was a people in Eastern Europe who still thought of themselves as Romans – or at least Romanians – and preserved their Romance language as Slavic speaking incomers crowded around them. Today, Romania’s only non-Slavic speaking neighbour is Hungary, whose Uralic language is unrelated to Romance or Slavic languages.

The 19th century weakening of the Ottoman Empire spawned a clutch of new would-be nation states (itself a 19th century idea). The ‘Great Powers’ – Great Britain, France, Russia, the Austro-Hungarian Empire and others - maintained a firm grip on proceedings, they did not want these newcomers getting above themselves.

In the Treaty of Paris, 1856, the Great Powers acceded in to the Moldavia-Walachia unionist campaign and allowed the two principalities to combine, provide they maintained separate governments and each elected their own ‘dominator’ or ruling prince. Spotting that the treaty had not specified ‘different dominators,’ both principalities chose Alexandru Ioan Cuza thus forming a ‘proto-Romania,’ though still nominally within the Ottoman Empire.

Romania after the Wallachia-Moldavia Union
copyright Anonimu, reproduced under CC BY-SA 4.0

Alexandru Ioan Cuza
The old map (top of the post) includes a ‘Moldova’ inside Romania and a ‘Republic of Moldova’ outside Romania’s borders. It shows no Moldavia. Confusing? Much. We visited the Republic of Moldova in 2018, they use ‘Moldavia’ to describe themselves, plus the Romanian Moldova, but the ‘Moldavia-Walachia Union’ did not include the current Republic of Moldova - although Romanian speaking it had been ceded to Russia by the Ottomans in 1812.

It did not include Transylvania either, but for different reasons. Transylvania was part of  Austro-Hungary, and ruled by a Hungarian elite. It also had a substantial German speaking minority. The Transylvania Saxons (though they were not, strictly speaking, Saxons) had been invited to settle in 13th century and formed a second, business and intellectual elite. The Romanians hewed wood and drew water.

A coup d’etat in 1866 replaced Cuza with Prince Karl of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen. German Unification generated many unemployed princelings and the great powers liked to parachute them into the new countries of eastern Europe. Some failed spectacularly, others like Prince Karl,who became Prince Carol of Romania, were outstandingly successful. Romania achieved full independence in 1878 and Prince Carol became King Carol I.

King Carol I, Bucharest

At the start of World War I, the King understandably leant towards Germany, and with Romania jammed between Bulgaria and Austro-Hungary it appeared the safer option, but his government leant the other way. Romania dithered until given an ultimatum in 1916. By then Carol I had died and his son, Carol II was prepared to declare war on Germany. Unfortunately, the Russian Revolution soon took their major local ally out of the war.

The final war years were difficult, but at the end Romania reaped the benefits of backing the winners. Their gains included Transylvania from Austro-Hungary, and the Republic of Moldova from the Russia.

Romania between the Wars

World War II and Beyond

In 1940 Stalin annexed the Republic of Moldova under cover of the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and Germany supported the transfer of Northern Transylvania to Hungary. The consequences in Romania were a fascist coup and the abdication of King Carol II, so when Hitler attacked the USSR, Romanian troops fought alongside their Germans comrades. In 1944, with the Germans now retreating, King Michael (the son of Carol II) led a counter-coup and Romania switched side.

Being on the winning side was less profitable in WW II. Transylvania was regained, but not the Republic of Moldova, and they got 42 years of Communist rule as a bonus. From 1965-89 that meant rule by Nicolae Ceauşescu

Nicolae Ceaușescu, 1965
Ceaușescu's criticisms of the Soviet Union made him, briefly, the west’s favourite communist and he made a state visit to the UK and had tea with the Queen. Unfortunately, his independent stance was more to do with his increasing narcissism than political flexibly. Romania became an unpleasant place to live and Ceaușescu ran a close second to Albania’s Enver Hoxha as Europe’s nastiest post 1945 leader. In 1989 when all the other eastern European regimes realised the game was up and gave in gracefully, Ceaușescu carried on, confident of the love of his people. For that misjudgement he was forcibly deposed and executed.

Since 1989 Romania has struggled towards parliamentary democracy, joining NATO in 2004 and the EU in 2007. For the last fifteen years everything has been absolutely wonderful, every single day. Not really, Romania still has problems, but they used to be worse.

Romania in Numbers

I like numbers. I know they are not to everybody's taste, but properly read that pack a lot of information into a small space.

Romania covers 284,000 km², making it the world’s 81st largest country, a little smaller than the Untied Kingdom and, for American readers, a little bigger than Minnesota.

The population is around 19 million (less than ⅓ of the UK’s) with a population density of 80 people/ km² making it one of Europe’s emptier countries.

Economically Romania has made great strides since joining the EU, but it remains one of the bloc's poorest countries and horse drawn vehicles are occasionally seen in rural areas. The Gross Domestic Product per Capita is a modest US$18,530, which ranks 54th in the world and 22nd out of 27 in the EU. 

At ‘Purchasing Power Parity’ this works out at US$41,633. These are GDP figures, not people's incomes, though they are related and the figures suggest that Romanians may not have much money, but a lowish cost of living makes life much easier.

Urban Romania, at least in the cities we saw, looks prosperous enough, and the road network is good, so the country feels as if it is now part of the European mainstream.

Thursday 20 August 2020

A Collection of Arcs de Triomphe (None of them in Paris) Part 2, Post-1900

Triumphal Arches - What is and What is Not

This is the third iteration of this post. The original, published 01-Apr-2014, was ‘Four Arcs de Triomphe (none of them in Paris). The second, 29-June-2018, included newly collected arches, but also omitted Lutyens’ India Gate from the earlier post on the grounds it was a War Memorial, not a Triumphal Arch.

Defining a Triumphal Arch is difficult. Some arches called Triumphal have no associated triumph, and then there are Monumental Gates and War Memorials which can look very similar.

Although retaining the title, I have chosen a new and more inclusive definition for these posts (there are now two of them, this one and pre-1900). For the purposes of this blog an ‘Arc de Triomphe’ is an arch with no structural purpose. This definition includes war memorials built in arch form – like the India Gate mentioned above and also Monumental Gates as long as they were built to be symbolic i.e. not city gates built as part of a wall, even if the wall has long gone. The other qualification of inclusion is that I have been there and taken the photograph.

Arches of the 20th and 21st Centuries

For Classical Arches and modern arches built before 1900, see part 1.

All the arches below owe a debt to the Parisian Arc, (almost) the first modern Arc de Triomphe. In some cases the debt is very obvious, for others it is more in spirit than in substance.

So, In order of construction:

The Gateway of India, Mumbai

Completed 1924, Visited 14-Mar-2019

India

In 1911 George V became the first British monarch to visit the Jewel in the Crown. The Gateway of India on the Mumbai (then Bombay) waterfront was conceived as a symbolic entrance to the sub-continent for the King-Emperor and Queen-Empress.

Careful planning is not just a feature of the current British government. In 1911 the King and Queen passed through a world-beating cardboard gate, the stone version would be built once the design.was agreed.

The Gateway of India, Mumbai

The foundation stone was laid in March 1913 but another year passed before George Wittet’s Indo-Saracenic gate was given the go-ahead. Work was completed in 1924.

The gateway was subsequently used as a symbolic entrance to British India by important colonial personnel and the last British troops left through it at independence in 1948. Once unpopular as a representation of "conquest and colonisation" it is now a symbol of the city and an attraction to tourists and the army of street vendors that prey upon them.

The India Gate, New Delhi

Completed 1931, Visited 16-Feb-2013

At the start of the 20th century Edwin Lutyens had the rare privilege of designing a new capital for Britain’s most prized possession. The ceremonial Kingsway, leading to the Viceroy’s palace through the administrative heart of his new city, was modelled on The Mall, but with a nod to the Champs Elysées.

The India Gate, New Delhi

In 1921 he was commissioned to build a memorial to the Indian soldiers who died fighting for the Empire in the First World War. It is now a memorial to the 70,000 who died in conflicts between 1914 and 1920. Completed in 1931, The India Gate was placed at the opposite end of the Kingsway (now Rajpath) from the Viceroy’s Palace (now the President’s Palace). If the Kingsway nodded toward the Champs Elysées, the India Gate bows deeply towards the Arc de Triomphe.

Arcul de Triumf, Bucharest

Completed in 1936, Visited 25-Jun-2023

Romania

With the world organised as it is, we do occasionally have to remind ourselves that it was not always thus, and most nation-states, even in Europe, are creations of the 19th century; there was no Germany before 1860 and no Italy before 1861. A Romania, smaller than the present country, achieved recognition as an independent state in 1878 and a wooden Arcul de Triumf was constructed on what would become a roundabout in north east Bucharest.

The end of World War One saw the creation of a larger Romania that included most speakers of the Romanian language. This required the construction of a new arch on the same site. It was designed by Petre Antonescu with a concrete interior and a heavily sculpted plaster exterior. The plaster became badly eroded, so in 1936 Antonescu designed a new, more durable and less flamboyant arch and that has survived to this day (with restoration work in 2014).

Arcul de Triumf, Bucharest

It is not the grandest of Arcs de Triomphe, and rather outside the city centre, though its roundabout is negotiated by all visitors being driven into Bucharest from the airport. Military parades pass beneath it every 1st of December, Romania’s national day.

Monumento a la Revolución, Mexico City

Built 1938 Visited 18-Nov-2017

Mexico

Intended as a neo-classical home for the Federal Legislative Palace, building started in 1910 but was halted two years later by the revolution. In 1938 the completed first stage was adapted as a monument to the revolution that halted the building and it now contains the tombs of five revolutionary heroes including Pancho Villa.

Monument a la Revolucion, Mexico City

Transforming the core of a parliament building into a triumphal arch altered the neo-classical intention into something that has been described as Mexican socialist realism. Whatever the label, I think it’s ugly (sorry Mexico). At 75m high it is the world’s highest triumphal arch, but please don’t tell Kim Jung Un, he would only make his bigger.

Independence Monument, Phnom Penh

Cambodia

Completed 1958 Visited 17th of February 2014

This 37m high sandstone arch was built in 1958 to celebrate Cambodian independence from France some five years previously. It now also commemorates Cambodia's war dead - and there are a vast number for such a small country.

The Independence Monument, Phnom Penh

Designed by Cambodian architect Vann Molyvann to resemble a lotus shaped stupa, it sits at the intersection of Norodom Boulevard and Sihanouk Boulevard, and is the ceremonial, if not geographical, centre of the city. A flame is lit on the inner pedestal, usually by the King, at times of national celebration and commemoration.

Patouxai, Vientiane

Laos

Built 1957-68, Visited 1st of March 2014

Ironically, this Arc de Triomphe was built to commemorate victory over the French. Laos gained its independence in 1954 after the first Indo-China War and Patouxai (Victory Arch) was built in the late 1950s. Less reverently it is known as ‘The Vertical Runway’ as there is a story that it was built from concrete donated by the Americans for airport construction.

Patouxai (Victory Arch), Vientiane

There are stairs inside and shops at three levels. From the top there is a good view over the gardens below one way and down Lan Xang Avenue – Vientiane’s Champs Elysées the other.

The Arch of Triumph, Pyongyang

Built 1982, Visited 9th September 2013

North Korea

North Korea’s Arch of Triumph, in Triumphant Return Square, commemorates Kim Il Sung's return to the capital (in 1948) and his founding of the Democratic People's' Republic of Korea after almost single-handedly driving the Japanese colonialists from his country (DPRK history avoids mentioning the global conflict and ignores contributions made by other combatants, including the Chinese, British and the hated Americans).

It was built in 1982 to celebrate his 70th birthday and is is blatant rip off of the French ‘original’. Two interesting details are that a) it is 10m taller than the Parisian Arch and b) that fact was the first thing we were told when we arrived in the square; delusions of grandeur and a chip on the shoulder being most obvious attributes of Kim Il Sung and the dynasty he founded.

Arch of Triumph, Pyongyang

Pyongyang’s sparse traffic means that it is perfectly safe to stand in the middle of the ‘Champs Elysées’ to take a photograph.

Eternal Flame, Martyrs Alley, Baku

Opened 9th of October 1998 Visited 12th of August 2014

Azerbaijan

The events of Azerbaijan’s Black January are little known in the UK.

In 1990 in, the dying days of its empire the Soviet Union declared a state of emergency in Azerbaijan. The Popular Front responded by imposing roadblocks around Baku which Soviet troops broke through, killing some 130 unarmed protestors. The Russian claims that the first shots came from the Azeri side, are hotly disputed. What our otherwise admirable Azeri guide did not tell us was that the state of emergency was declared to stop a pogrom which had killed 90 of Baku’s Armenian residents. What the Armenians never mentioned when we were there, was that the pogrom was provoked by Armenia granting citizenship to ethnic Armenians in the Azeri district of Nagorno Karabakh. What the Azeris forget to mention..... and so on in a time-honoured chicken-and-egg argument. The resulting Azerbaijan-Armenia war ended in 1994 with Karabakh becoming a de facto independent state (now called Artsakh) and Azerbaijan feeling miffed. Negotiations – and occasional shootings - continue. [Including a major outbreak in 2020.]

In Martyr's Alley the 130 who died in Black January are commemorated with names and photographs in black marble. At the end is an eternal flame.

Eternal Flame, Martyr's Alley, Baku

The eternal flame is the biggest test of my new rule for deciding what should be in and what out. Can it really be called an arch? Is it more of an elongated, heavyweight gazebo? I said I would be inclusive, so it is in.

The Arch of Bender

Built 2008 Visited  27th June 2018

Transnistria

Bender (or Bendery, sometimes Tighina) is a city on the right bank of the River Dniester in the breakaway Republic of Transnistria, officially part of Moldova. Bender was on the front line in many of the wars between the Russian and Ottoman Empires, its fortress being taken by the Russians in 1779, 1789 and 1806 (and lost in between). An arch commemorating the Russian capture of Bender Fort in 1806 was erected in Chişinău, the Moldovan capital, but was destroyed, along with much else, in 1944.

The Arch of Bender, Bender, Transnistria

This arch in Bender is a 2008 replica of that destroyed arch. The major result of the 1806-12 war was the Russian Empire’s gain of Bessarabia (approximately Moldova and Transnistria), so the arch is a message, or warning, from the Russian orientated Transnistrians to the Moldovans and their European ambitions.

Porta Macedonia, Skopje

North Macedonia

Built 2011 Visited May 2015

The Porta Macedonia was designed by Valentina Stefanovska as part of the then Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski’s ‘Skopje 2014’ project which saddled the capital with a series of grandiose monuments at great expense. Despite its name it is not a gate, nor is it a war memorial, but the design is classic Triumphal Arch, so that is what it must be, though apart from commemorating 20 years of Macedonian independence it is unclear what the ‘triumph’ was.

Porta Macedonia

I am unconvinced that spending €4.4m on a triumphal arch was the best use of money, which is not overabundant in Skopje. Gruevski was prime minister from 2006 until forced to resign in 2016. In May 2018 he started a two years prison sentence for corruption.

and finally....

This space is available free to any country willing to build itself a pointless arch